Already a DIA Member? Sign in. Not a member? Join.

Sign in

Forgot User ID? or Forgot Password?

Not a Member?

Create Account and Join

DIA Participant Compensation Study – Detail Page
At a Glance
Launch Year
2025
Participating
39 members across
14 organizations
Focus Areas
01Compensation Design & Derivation
02Benchmarking & Variability Analysis
03Clinical Trial Performance Outcomes
Principal Investigators
Ken Getz
Tufts CSDD
Mary Jo Lamberti
Tufts CSDD
Project Manager
Maria Paula Bautista Acelas
DIA
Overview

About the Research Study

Led by DIA in partnership with Tufts CSDD, this research examines how participant compensation is designed, implemented, and benchmarked across clinical trials — and how these practices relate to trial performance outcomes.

Using mixed methodology, the study evaluates compensation structures across phases and therapeutic areas and analyzes their impact on key performance indicators, including recruitment speed, retention, enrollment diversity, and protocol complexity.

📊 Study Approach
  • Mixed-methodology design combining qualitative interviews and quantitative data analysis
  • Analysis across Phase I–III protocols, therapeutic areas, and protocol complexity levels
  • Linking compensation practices to recruitment speed, retention, diversity, and protocol execution
Why It Matters

Closing a Critical Evidence Gap in Trial Design

Participant compensation is a critical yet inconsistently applied aspect of clinical trial design, with limited empirical evidence to guide best practices. By linking compensation approaches to real-world trial performance, this work enables more evidence-based strategies that better serve both patients and clinical development goals.

Data-Driven Benchmarks

Providing evidence-based benchmarks on compensation amounts and structures across sponsors, phases, and therapeutic areas.

Better Recruitment & Retention

Identifying compensation practices associated with improved recruitment speed, participant retention, and enrollment diversity.

Equitable Trial Design

Supporting more equitable, transparent, and operationally effective trial designs that serve both patients and sponsors.

Policy & Decision Support

Informing sponsor decision-making and future policy discussions with rigorous, real-world evidence.

Study Design

Focus Areas

Three interconnected focus areas structure the study’s scope and analytical approach.

1
Compensation Design & Derivation

Understanding how compensation amounts and structures are determined across sponsors and therapeutic areas.

2
Benchmarking & Variability Analysis

Comparing compensation practices by phase, protocol complexity, and therapeutic area.

3
Clinical Trial Performance Outcomes

Assessing relationships among compensation practices and enrollment speed, retention, diversity, and protocol execution.

Progress & Milestones

Key Activities & Status

Sep 2025
Study Kickoff

Alignment and finalization of scope, study launch.

Oct–Jan 2026
Instrument Development & Qualitative Insights

Development of data collection tools and interview guide; conduct of in-depth interviews with clinical operations professionals; synthesis and review of findings with the consortium.

Feb–Mar 2026
Sponsor Data Collection

Submission of data from 12 recently completed Phase I–III protocols, including compensation details, protocol characteristics, and trial performance metrics.

April 2026
Preliminary Results Review

Review and discussion of initial findings with participating organizations.

May 2026
Final Analyses & Reporting

Delivery of final aggregated results and customized benchmark reports for participating organizations.

Jun–Jul 2026
Dissemination

Preparation of publications and presentations to share insights with the broader life sciences community.

Impact & Outputs

Key Deliverables

This study will generate actionable insights and benchmarking resources to support more effective patient-centered clinical trial design.

Custom Sponsor Benchmark Reports

Confidential reports comparing individual company practices against aggregated consortium benchmarks.

Aggregate Summary Report

A de-identified analysis of compensation practices and trial performance outcomes based on data contributed by participating companies.

Publications & Presentations

Co-authored manuscripts, conference presentations, and webinars led by DIA, Tufts CSDD, and participating companies.

Partners & Collaborators

Participating Organizations

This project brings together a multi-stakeholder group of sponsors and CROs with expertise in clinical operations, research methodology, patient engagement, and benchmarking.

Amgen
Biogen
Boehringer-Ingelheim
CSL Behring
Eli Lilly and Company
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Merck
Parexel
PPD / ThermoFisher Scientific
Premier Research International LLC
Roche / Genentech
Sanofi
Suvoda
Governance & Leadership

Study Leadership

The study is jointly led by DIA and Tufts CSDD, with active input from participating organizations.

Ken Getz
Ken Getz
Tufts CSDD
Principal Investigator

Ken Getz is the Executive Director and a Professor at the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University School of Medicine. He is also the chairman of CISCRP — a nonprofit organization that he founded to educate and raise public and patient awareness of the clinical research enterprise.

A well-known speaker at conferences, symposia, universities, investor meetings and corporations, Ken also holds a number of board appointments in the private and public sectors. He received an MBA from the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University and a bachelor’s degree, Phi Beta Kappa, from Brandeis University.

Mary Jo Lamberti
Mary Jo Lamberti, Ph.D.
Tufts CSDD
Principal Investigator

Mary Jo Lamberti is on the faculty at Tufts University and is Director of Sponsored Research at Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development (CSDD). She is a global expert on benchmarking drug development operating practices.

Her research focuses on a variety of areas including outsourcing and partnerships, clinical supplies, investigative site initiation and management, patient recruitment and retention, and the use of technologies and digital solutions in clinical trials. She has published extensively and is a frequent speaker at global conferences.

Dr. Lamberti holds a BA from Wellesley College and a PhD in psychology from Boston University.

Maria Paula Bautista Acelas
Maria Paula Bautista Acelas
DIA
Senior Scientific Project Manager

Maria Paula Bautista Acelas serves as Senior Scientific Project Manager at DIA, where she leads day-to-day coordination and development of DIA research projects. She works closely with scientific advisors, research partners, and sponsor organizations to advance DIA’s patient-centered research mission.

How to Participate

Get Involved

Participation is currently limited to a select group of organizations. We welcome interest from additional stakeholders and are maintaining a list for future engagement opportunities. Updates and key findings will be shared as the research progresses.

Contact Maria Paula
Benefits of Participation
Access to confidential, customized benchmarking of compensation practices
Early insights into strategies linked to improved trial performance
Collaboration with peers and subject matter experts
Thought leadership opportunities, including co-authorship and visibility across publications, conferences, and educational programs
Get Involved

Ready to Collaborate?

If you or your organization want to learn more about the DIA Participant Compensation Study or other DIA Research projects, please contact us.

Be informed and stay engaged.

Don't miss an opportunity - join our mailing list to stay up to date on DIA insights and events.