Already a DIA Member? Sign in. Not a member? Join.

Sign in

Forgot User ID? or Forgot Password?

Not a Member?

Create Account and Join

Menu Back to Poster-Presentations-Details

P103: Seizure Risk Among Older Adults with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Initiating Enzalutamide vs. Abiraterone





Poster Presenter

      Ebere Okpara

      • PhD Candidate
      • University of Illinois Chicago
        United States

Objectives

To compare the risk of new seizure events in older men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with enzalutamide versus abiraterone using real-world data. There is limited evidence of their comparative seizure risk due to a lack of head-to-head clinical trials.

Method

We performed a retrospective cohort study using SEER-Medicare data (2012–2017). Men with prior seizure/antiseizure medication were excluded. The primary outcome was the 1-year risk of seizure. Baseline covariates were balanced using inverse probability weighting and risk estimated with time-to-event

Results

The cohort included 4,910 patients (1,806 enzalutamide initiators, 3,104 abiraterone initiators). The mean age of the study population was 78.0 (SD=6.8) years. Among the cohort, 33% of men had distant (de novo metastatic) disease at diagnosis. During follow-up, 55 seizure events were observed. The one-year cumulative incidence of seizure was 2.1% (95% CI: 1.2%, 2.9%) for enzalutamide and 1.8% (95% CI: 1.1%, 2.5%) for abiraterone, with a corresponding risk ratio (RR) of 1.14 (95% CI: 0.48, 1.81). A post-hoc analysis of outcomes at 6 months was performed, and it showed a stronger difference in the risk of seizure though the confidence interval for the RR was still wide and compatible with the null (RR = 1.88; 95% CI: 0.63, 3.13).

Conclusion

The absolute risk of seizure was low in both abiraterone and enzalutamide treated individuals who did not have a prior seizure history. While there was a slightly higher seizure risk in enzalutamide than abiraterone at 6 and 12 months, precision was limited and the contrast was not statistically nor clinically significant, suggesting concerns about seizure risk may not be critical in treatment selection for MCRPC among those without a prior seizure history.

Be informed and stay engaged.

Don't miss an opportunity - join our mailing list to stay up to date on DIA insights and events.