Back to Agenda
Session 5 / Venue 3: Regulatory Communication – What will be occurred by implementation of Key Action Date to the review process?
Session Chair(s)
Yoshihiko Ono, RPh
Head of Regulatory Affairs
MSD K.K., Japan
“To deliver good medicines to patients” is the important task. In order to achieve this goal, it is necessary to handle review smoothly after filing an application for approval. Last year, we particularly discussed as to the importance of good communication between the PMDA and applicants. This year, we’ll take the discussion one step further, from viewpoint of “How to make efficient communication with the PMDA in appropriate timing in the review process.” Currently, key Action Dates of query, response, reporting, etc. are determined for each PMDA consultation, but there is no big problem. When the concept of this “Key Action Date” is introduced to approval review process, what will occur? What will be brought to the review process? We’ll have discussion about the feasibility and the advantages and disadvantages of the introduction and consider deeply about “good review process”, exchanging opinions between companies and the authorities.
Speaker(s)
Should the key Action Date be set in the J-NDA review process ? - Comparison to EMA/CP.
Hirotaka Chaki
Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Japan
Head of Regulatory Information Management; Product Development
Should the key Action Date be set in the J-NDA review process? - The merit and demerit
Hiroyuki Sato, MS
Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Japan
Deputy General Manager, Product Development Regulatory Affairs Dept
Current situation of J-NDA review process and management
Shinobu Uzu, PhD
Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), Japan
Senior Executive Director
Have an account?